The Article 4 AI literacy course is now on sale and delivers itself, with its own academy
While everyone watched 2 August, there is an obligation in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act that has been enforceable since February 2025 and has gone almost entirely unnoticed: whoever uses AI in a company has to have enough training on what the tool can do, on its risks and on its limits. That's Article 4, and it binds whoever uses AI, not only whoever builds it.
From today, the course that deals with it is bought on the training page and delivers itself. You choose how many people, you pay, and on the same screen you enrol each of them: everyone gets their own academy access and starts whenever they like.
One thing first, because it decides whether this is for you: the course is taught in Spanish. We'd rather say so here than let somebody find out after paying.
Why it lands on you even if you aren't an AI company
This is the part that's hardest to accept, and it's where most companies are exposed right now. Article 4 applies just the same when nobody formally decided anything. If somebody on a team opened a free tool on their own and has been using it with client documents for months, the obligation has been enforceable since February 2025 and not from the day management finds out.
And it asks for appropriate measures, not an exam per person or an accredited level. Documenting them isn't mandatory, but it's exactly what you show if somebody asks. Without paper there's no way to demonstrate anything.
What you get
- The course, online and at your own pace, built on cases rather than theory: Article 4 doesn't ask you to know the law, it asks you to know how to use AI.
- One seat per person. It isn't a company licence: each employee has their own account, their own progress and their own certificate.
- The document kit, already made: an AI use policy, the training record and the Article 4 checklist.
- A certificate on completion, with its serial number.
The kit is half the value and it's worth saying so plainly. The course trains people, but what you show when somebody asks is the file: who was trained, in what, when, what use policy is written down and who answers for it.
What we won't promise you
There is no official AI Act compliance badge, not for training and not for anything else. The regulation never created one. Our certificate evidences that this person took this course, with a date, and that's everything a certificate issued by us can evidence.
Nor are we going to tell you the course settles the matter. Article 4 is one piece; Article 50, the one about notices, is a different one and gets resolved elsewhere. If you want to know which ones land on you before buying anything, the check is free and gives the full result without asking you to register.
An example to make it concrete
Imagine an eight-person accountancy firm where three people use an AI assistant to draft emails and summarise client paperwork. Nobody decided it, it simply happened. With the course, those three are trained in an afternoon, the firm ends up with a one-page policy saying what may and may not go into that tool, and with a dated record of who was trained. It's a hypothetical example, but it describes well the situation most of the practices we talk to are in.
And a decision about how it's delivered
The academy lives on its own site, separate from the website, and access is granted immediately without anyone on our side having to step in. It's the first thing we sell completely automatically, which is why it was tested with real purchases before opening: a flow that sends emails isn't tested until a real email goes out.
See what's included at AI training.